and let's
make believe that dog plasma was this guy who was always dirty. not filthy
dirty, just dirty. it was his day to day state. dirty and worn.
and he
was busy. he didn't sit down much. when he did he'd usually hop back up
again in a moment. if when he sat for awhile he'd always have something
in his hands and be doing something with it. it looked like he was taking
it apart and putting it together again. this may or may not have been what
he was doing.
that
was until he was shot.
he was
sitting on this park bench with whatever it was in his hands he was doing
whatever with when this fat woman strolled behind him and put a gun to
the back of his head and pulled the trigger. his nose exploded. his hands
dropped whatever it was to the ground. the woman walked around him and
picked it up and went over to where a car was waiting for her to get in
a drive away.
buzz
zip watched all this while walking toward where it happened on his way
to the library. he had been looking at dog but didn't notice the woman
until the shot went off. buzz knew dog. he saw him just about every day
some place. he had met him when they both worked at this italian restaurant.
buzz was a busser and dog a dishwasher. they both got fired together caught
smoking dope in the garbage alley. buzz had a few other jobs since then.
dog didn't. even that job seemed borderline for him.
a man
and a woman in suits walking toward buzz on the other side of where dog
had been shot stopped. the man took out a phone and made a call. buzz assumed
911. the woman stood and mouthed, oh my god, over and over again.
buzz
left the park and crossed the street. he didn't want to talk to anyone,
especially cops.
as he
walked around to the library he tried to figure out why someone would want
to shoot dog and take whatever it was he had in his busy hands. he'd never
paid much attention to what it might have been before. he didn't see dog
for longer than to say, hey, as he was walking by. dog would look up and
nod and maybe say, hey, back. that's the way it was with most people buzz
knew. he really didn't want to listen to much more of what they might have
to say - especially dog who would ramble on some monotone rant about whatever
if one let him. buzz had thought of recording him maybe and mixing it in
with some of the music he made.
now let's
pretend that that is the end of that story.
we have
met who we are and we are them. we are those who were innocently slaughtered.
we are those who slaughtered the innocent. we are those who lived in the
promised land that others invaded and took from us. we are those who invaded
the promised land and took it from those who lived there.
when
the israelites blew their trumpets, then the roman legions raised their
standards, then the spanish conquistadors set sail, when the u.s. cavalry
saddled up, when the nazi tanks rolled, we were among them as we were among
those who stood in their path. we are the survivors of those wars we fought
against ourselves both as the aggressors and defenders. the wars we are
still fighting for whatever victory and glory can be had. the strong against
the weak. the weak against the weaker. we have done this. this has been
done to us. between us and them the lines become blurred. but we are them.
and it
falls as it rises. these thoughts come to him as he sits in the cafe writing
them down. he is thirsty. the water is cold but flat. thoughts from vague
impressions underlying the words these impressions trigger. and it rises
as it falls.
the notion
of it. it as a noun, not a pronoun. it represents nothing but itself. it
as the thing that is. it as it itself. thing as verb - the-ing. as it comes
from nowhere and goes to nowhere. nowhere being here and now. maybe. and
he is left in it. others have come and gone. from and to nowhere. he remains
with it. it is constant though ever-changing. it as this or that or the
other thing. it as it manifests itself as that which he perceives around
himself it to be. as what he imagines it to be. it speaks to him as such.
he speaks to it as such. in a manner of speaking.
out in
the night on this thin line where the lonely wander and remain alone. it
is in this loneliness. one will not find it in the crowd - unless one is
alone in the crowd.
it draws
and leads one outside. this is where it is and when one finds it when one
is not distracted by the flash of things generated out of it. yet one must
not ignore the flash of things either because that is all it is. it is
not that which it is not except it is. one need only remember that there
is only it. oneself and it, and maybe not even that. it is illusion, but
not illusion in the sense of illusion masking something else or as being
something not real.
is this
a test?
is this
the correct answer?
as it
breaks it comes together. and on and on with the usual phrases of description
that are uttered by those finding themselves in this trance of no return.
his thoughts
are no more than a smoking cigarette. the smoke spirals in the air twirling
with the slightest current from a door opening or someone walking by before
it loses its fragile coherency and joins the general haze.
then
one puts the cigarette out.
one thinks.
one smokes a cigarette. one writes about thinking and smoking a cigarette.
one hangs out in one cafe or another. one thinks once in awhile that one
might be doing something else. one puts the cigarette out.
soon
one lights another one. everything comes and goes in and out of the smoke.
it's all part of the general haze that lingers here and there. one sees
ghosts in the haze. these ghosts are people. one recognizes some of the
faces and knows a few of their names. there is a certain familiarity to
all this as there is a certain strangeness. one cannot decide if the familiarity
seems strange or the strangeness seems familiar. all comes and goes but
something always remains. the people come and go but there are always people.
conversation about the weather or the nature of the cosmos.
there
is beauty in ugliness. there is joy in sorrow. not despite of but because
of. they are not divided. one does not replace the other. one who sees
the beauty and feels the joy must gaze into the ugliness and embrace the
sorrow.
there
is nothing between one thing and another. there is not one thing and another
for there to be anything between.
there
is isolation from others and there is isolation from oneself. there is
what is and what one feels there ought to be.
he feels
these levels of isolation from others and himself. but are they felt more
so in him than in others?
there
are those who aspire to please the gods and those who aspire to be the
gods.
out of
the nature of the human mind composing reality out of what is and what
ought to be. the area between what is perceived and what is imagined.
and all
of this is painting a landscape describing outlines and sketches of possibilities.
but there is nothing here. otherwise it would have been explored and surveyed
and mapped in detail and farmed and mined and great cities of industry
would now be seen as elsewhere where there was thought to be paradise.
he can only think that these spaces he is allowed to wander freely as left
as places where those are exiled who won't co-operate with the way of things
as the masses think of them.
but who
is he but one among the masses? there is nothing that he is aware of that
distinguishes him apart from them. his experiences and thoughts of his
experiences seem to him, as much as he is able to judge based on the information
available to him, are rather common and ordinary, yet maybe not spoken
of as such. yet the others seem to consider him as someone unusual apart
from them.
doo-wah-ditty-dada.
he goes
around through this again and again. from one view it seems one way. from
another view it seems another way. like an optical illusion of one image
interlocked with another and one sees either or depending. the reality
that is conjured in one's mind existing between what is perceived and what
is imagined. and those who insist upon one view over the other and go to
war.
all of
that on the distant shore of the sea far from where he perceives or imagines
himself being on the island. all of that somewhere out in the world far
from where he centers himself in his mind. he hears the distant echoes
of it that reverberate everywhere from the great noise it makes. and once
in awhile waves of it do arrive and shake him. one cannot entirely escape.
one survives or one does not. one is injured and heals and becomes stronger
or one is injured and heals and becomes weaker.
he has
survived so far. in many ways stronger. in many ways weaker. at some time
he will be overcome and exist here no more. within that which is always
changing no part remains unchanged. yet there are those who believe that
eternity is changeless and that they can become changeless with it. how
boring. but he has this fantasy as well to become that which was before
and will be after. the eternal here and now. yet here and now is always
changing. that which brings all into existence out of itself and that which
brings all out of existence into itself. it is it. it is the sole and only
thing that all else is. it is and is not. no definition perceived or imagined
by anything created by it can encompass it.
he thinks
to himself, it exists. there is nothing that exists that is not it. there
is nothing that does not exist that is not it. he is it whether he exists
or not. yet one must be open to all possibility and one possibility is
that something might not be it whether it exists or not. and he might be
that something. yet even considering all possibility one must remember
that all possibility is it and it is all possibility - even possibility
that is not possible. so even if he is not it he is still it. unless he's
not.
there is only contradiction in that way of thinking when it is thought
of in the human mind within terms of human perception and imagination.
the human mind creates the contradiction. the human mind exists within
contradiction. creation is based on contradiction from the first it divided
this from that and the other thing. without that division there is no creation.
within this division of creation all contradiction exists together. without
this there is just a general haze of nothingness like cigarette smoke.
the legendary sea o' chaos. to create it must divide and separate that
stuff of itself and define this as not that or the other thing. or anything
else. each is what it is. and even then things are not all that clear.
it is the primal contradiction. this, that and the other thing are not
things in and of themselves but are the stuff of it divided and separated
apart and defined. and all that blah blah blah business...
he giggles and dances an odd little step with a spin and lands on his face
on the sandy beach of the island. thing approaches dressed in flowing purple
robes and jet black hair with sparkles of diamond dust sprinkled through
it and holding a jade wand.
what
are you doing? thing asks.
being
an idiot, he said somberly and standing up and brushing himself off.
that's
what i thought.
and what
the flying fuck are you pretending to be?
i do
not pretend. i am. i am that which i at any time appear to be. that is
my nature.
ok. so
what are you presently appearing to be?
hot shit.
you don't
seem like hot shit to me.
that's
because you cannot perceive or imagine me as i am. my appearance before
you is shadowed by the limitations of your mind.
am i
now to prostrate myself and grovel before you?
you can
if you wish.
i'll
pass.
if that
is what you wish. i do not desire that you do anything other than what
is your free will.
even
free will that suffers from such limitations as mine?
that
is also your free will.
the limitations?
yes.
yeah
- i suppose that's possible. it doesn't matter.
not if
you feel that it doesn't.
i don't
suppose that there is a point to this, is there?
do you
need there to be a point?
only
because of my limitations.
then
what point do your limitations need?
oh, probably
any point would do.
there
are none that i am aware of.
is that
because perhaps of your limitations?
perhaps.
you don't
know?
perhaps
i do not. perhaps i do yet i do not wish to revel them to you.
oh well.
oh well?
oh well.
that's it. i see no reason to continue this with you.
does
that mean there is no reason?
it means
that i do not see any - or that i do not wish to revel them to you.
so there
may be a reason?
is there?
why ask
me?
who else
do i ask?
yourself.
i am
not speaking with myself at the moment.
unless
i am yourself.
then
asking
you is asking myself.
i suppose
that could be the case.
is it?
we're
going in circles.
really?
i hadn't noticed.
so now
what?
what
do you want?
everything.
as do
i.
we both
can't have everything.
we can't?
i wouldn't
think so.
i do
think so. we just agree to share it and stay out of each other's way.
and if
we cannot agree on that?
we fight
over it - which is a form of agreeing to share it.
is that
what we agree to?
if you
wish.
i wish
what you wish.
then
there is no reason to fight.
unless
that is what we agree to do.
correcto.
do we?
you already
asked that.
yes,
i suppose i did.
the world
turns around again. it's another day. he is again in the cafe. again drinking
coffee. again smoking cigarettes. and writing.
no one
else he knows is here except the working people and a few others who also
come in to drink coffee and smoke cigarettes. the radio babbles nonsense.
school
starts again tomorrow. another scam for more money he is supposed to pay
them back but he won't. more classes about various things that are taught.
he takes them to try to figure out what's going on - why what is being
taught is being taught? what is the origin? what is it's purpose? what
is it supposed to mean? etc. and who decides such things from what information
and for what motive? and who else is taking these classes? and on and on,
etc. questions that lead to more questions. it is so much easier not to
think along these lines. it's so much easier to accept things as given.
just find some niche one can fit oneself into and survive.
and he's
done that to some extent. he has found the niche where he's supposed to
be suffering from some sort of mental disorder and receives assistance
from the state and survives. what questions he has about this he keeps
to himself and his scribblings. he knows better than to bring any of it
up as the others are more than equipped to defend any attack on their position
- their own niches. they need do no more than let the status quo defend
them. the responses to his questions have been that this is the way things
are. he tried to ask if those answering him were satisfied with their own
answers. that was when he is told to leave, that he is causing problems
for everyone.
it seemed
to him that this system of organization that everyone was involved in was
mutually oppressive to all no matter where they were or who they were in
it. no one spoke of being happy with it or with their place in it, even
those who theoretically were in the most favorable and advantageous positions.
in some cases those bitched the most. and everyone saw others as being
the cause of the problems. each pointed to those who were set up in direct
opposition to themselves based on some reason or another. as far as he
could determine every side had their justification for its accusations
and every side was also full of exaggerated bullshit added to that justification
which made it virtually impossible for anyone to reason with them toward
any sort of compromise. everyone wanted it all their own way. compromise
was surrender.
so he
keeps as far away from it as he can. and that was what perhaps most people
tried to do. just lay low and ducking under the crossfire between the various
uncompromising groups of radical this and that and the other thing shooting
at each other in all directions.
and such
is the status quo. and if one should ask anyone if they are happy with
it they are told to fuck off and quit causing problems.
on the
island he causes problems only for himself and whatever he might conjure
up from his imagination.
and anyway,
he does have ideas that spiral and twist around about how he might change
all that and become the main number one problem everyone on the entire
planet has to deal with. these ideas are rather vague and are difficult
to grasp for very long at any one time and as are the reasons for them
being even ideas about anything at all. but such is their nature and the
only problem one might have with them is when one tries to grasp them.
one has to learn how to think of these ideas without grasping them - to
allow them their own space and course of direction. one cannot expect to
rein them in and confine them within confines of rational thought.
this
is made that much more difficult when one has been raised in a culture
that believes and teaches that any and all thought that is not rational
is madness and that those who are suspected of being mad are to be isolated
from the others.
one must
have faith - or at least some measure of doubt - in one's madness that
it is not really madness, though there is no rational reason why it is
not, while at the same time accepting that it will always be considered
madness by the others. one learns to keep up a certain front to the others
and not discuss anything concerning one's madness with any of them, even
those one is the closest to. no one is that close that they would be willing
to share in one's madness. this is learned through a lifetime of trial
and error after making many mistakes about what to discuss with who. one
learns where the lines are drawn dividing one's madness from the others
supposed rationality. one learns how to function in their world of rationality
while at the same time maintaining one's madness. not all can do this however.
the place
that one finds to do this is always a place of isolation. one needs to
accept that. but there are rewards. sometimes rewards from the others,
but mostly rewards from being able to enjoy one's madness on one's own.
one may often find that this allows one with certain freedom that one would
not normally have. it is the freedom of imagination. once one no longer
fears one's own imagination one is free to do just about most anything.
though
there is usually sacrifice, there can be material reward as well. he has
found this to be true in his own case. he is far better off now that he
is mad and has accepted his madness than he was trying to function in their
world. his basic needs are met and all of his time is his own to do whatever
he fucking pleases. and he still has his madness.
and what
is his madness?
that
is what he is now trying to discover. all he knows is that it is considered
almost universally by everyone to be madness. he has been told this by
numerous others. some are more subtle about telling him than others. he
has been called anything from being psychotic to being weird. but it all
amounts to the same thing. he is different than them. he is someone who
none of the others wish to be, even though some may admire him for being
it himself. most do not want to have anything to do with it as much as
possible.
he has
never understood any of this. he and they are all human and subject to
the normal individual and unique variations of being human and is common
to all humans which he shares in common with them and they with each other.
he could not determine exactly what it was about him that they saw and
agreed on that was fundamentally and radically different that divided and
separated him from them that none of them saw themselves as possessing
that is what they describe as madness. what the fuck is it? he knows he
is mad because he has been told that he is mad. there is something about
himself that they see that he does not. and even they seem to be rather
vague about what it is while at the same time being certain that he is
indeed mad.
this
is the limits of their rationality and sanity. the limits to his madness
and irrationality are not yet known. he may never know them. they are dogs
on chains who can only navigate within the circumference of the radius
of the chain - the chain of rationality. beyond lies the unknown and indescribable
- indescribable because this language he is using to write this out is
the language of rationality. describable by them only as being madness.
the limits
of rationality are limited. the limits of irrationality - madness - are
limitless. the sphere of rationality is contained within the sphere of
irrationality. as such, he can understand them but they cannot understand
him. rationality is not beyond him as irrationality is beyond them. they
each have a common center. the only difference is how much farther irrationality
can reach, being unchained, than can rationality from that center. the
center is the human mind. madness reaches beyond the human mind. madness
is all the things the human mind cannot be. madness is all things possible
and impossible. rationality considers only the possible.
rationalogic
and irrationalogic.
logic
being the common element and bond. the human mind thinks things logically.
the difference is whether that logic is rational or irrational. the rational
thinks 1 - 2 - 3, a - b - c. the irrational thinks 1 - moose - love, a
- blue - microscope.
and so
where does that leave us? we are thrown into our own madness to sink or
swim. he swam when the good ship rationality went down in the storm raging
on an otherwise calm sea. and after some time that was not measured in
time - rationalogical tick-tock time - he washed ashore upon the island.
and/or he was driven by his madness into the sanctuary of the center of
his mind. look upon it as one will with whatever set of definitions one
wishes to apply. it's all the same and none need apply. one knows and understands
this or one does not. this is a problem - if it is a problem - that one
solves for oneself. and there are many who solve it by ignoring it.
oh well.
ho-hum.
he wanders
about the island finding places on it he had not known before. it is an
island in the many respects of being an island as defined characteristics
of being an island but it encompasses space and time as far as he can imagine
as being infinite. of course what is imagined to be infinite by the human
mind is in all probability far short of anything that is actually infinite.
on the island is the imaginary city in all its mythological forms. on the
island is the best of all possible worlds and the worst of all possible
worlds - these worlds being the same worlds. on the island is excitement
and boredom, joy and sorrow, pleasure and pain. on the island is everything.
on the island is nothing. on the island is this and that and the other
thing. on the island is it. the island is it.
the island
is the island.
and all flaming bits of dada farted out the assholes of the swine charging into the sea having been invaded by the legion of demons sent into them by the lord most high jesus h. christ himself such that he might prove what a pompous self-righteous prick he is before the ignorant buffoons he was trying to impress that he and he alone is the way to their salvation from the pathetic state that he and his no holds barred eternal battle with his shadow-self satan was responsible for to begin with.
are you
enjoying yourself writing that stuff? jesus asked as he sat down at his
table.
enjoyment
is enjoyment, he said, writing is writing. neither might not have anything
to do with the other.
then
why write it?
it came
to me and i wrote it. because it can be written. what's the big deal?
do you
believe it?
believe
what?
what
you just wrote.
what
about it?
about
me being a pompous self-righteous prick.
well,
aren't you?
i am
what you make me to be. i am all things to all men.
what
about women?
them
too.
well
then, to me, you are a pompous self-righteous prick. in fact let me add
greedy overbearing intolerant and ass kissing.
ass kissing?
you kiss
your father's ass every chance you get - as i understand it.
if that's
how you choose to see it.
i just
say whatever i happen to say - or write. it's just that. as i said, what's
the big deal?
you are
creating your own hell with it, that's all.
hell?
what hell? i don't see any hell.
give
it time. you will.
perhaps.
but if so, i then refer you to what i wrote later about that being created
from your bitch fest with your own alter ego.
it's
a bit more than that.
is it?
this
is a battle within man himself. i am a symbol of that battle - of man's
own victory over himself.
and women
too, right?
right.
why don't
you just say human? get with the times, dude.
human
then.
and kissing
your father's ass and hanging yourself on a cross is the solution to this?
what
would you offer as an alternative in this situation?
what
situation?
man -
humans being at war with themselves.
i'd just
leave it.
but you
are human.
as much
as you are.
i am
spirit made flesh.
and i'm
not?
are you?
if you
are then i am. unless the deck has been rigged in your favor. and if that's
the case then you don't have any business saying shit to anybody, not until
you go through it with the same deal that we got - which is nothing. anybody
can fix it so they come out of it looking good if they have inside information
and connections. any schmuck can do that. you're just some guy who has
a big fat sugar daddy backing you up. that's nothing special. what's special
is getting through it without that - especially having to kiss daddy's
fat ass for it. i'm not impressed by anything you say or do. if you were
some common ordinary dumb fuck then i might be. but from someone who has
it handed to them on a silver platter i expect a little more.
such
as?
such
as renouncing any and all involvement with the whole dirty business instead
of strutting around promoting yourself as the son of god.
i never
said that.
no -
technically you didn't. but you allowed others to say it for you, my dear
son of man. i can smell slick pr miles away and what's been written about
you reeks of it. you never said you were but you never said you weren't
either.
should
i have? what would that have accomplished?
it would
have brought it down to a more human level for one thing. but anyone who
is promoted as being the son of god, whether they are or not, can suck
my dick. the son of god is nothing to me. why should i be impressed by
another's privilege? what is that to me? give me some of that privilege
and i can pull off the same tricks you did out of my hat. the whole thing
is a scam. a big fat set up so you and big daddy can have the whole world
full of pathetic frightened human creatures you purposefully created that
way to be as they are to tremble every time one of you say, boo. and all
so you can sit on your thrones and jerk yourselves off while those you
have duped sing praises to you for all eternity. i am amazed that someone
as all-knowing and all-powerful as you are supposed to be is as small as
that. what a joke.
this
is how you see it?
how else
should i see it?
and you
believe i am part of this?
no, i
believe that you are some lunatic who wandered in off the street who is
sitting at my table.
then
why bother talking to me?
i am
not talking to you. i am writing about talking to you.
and i'm
the lunatic?
you are
if i say you are. in the world inside my notebooks i make the rules.
and who's
playing god now?
i am.
so what?
don't
you face the same accusations you accuse me of?
probably,
except that i may play god in my own head but i don't impose it on others
and let them believe that i am god.
and i
did?
who do
you say i am? do you remember saying that?
yes.
need
i say more?
no.
at which
time a buzzer buzzed.
gotta
go, jesus said. things to do. people to meet.
sure.
get lost.
and jesus
split the scene. exit stage right.
next day.
no money. bum a cup of joe from one of the servers.
down
the line this will all collapse. he'll be out on the street again someday.
should he care?
burning
his karma.
he sits
at the center of his own world with everything coming in and nothing going
out - except this endless stream of words.
18 zillion
formulations of one point. possibilities of what is and what is not and
what lies between depending upon this or that or the other thing.
but there
are events. there is what happens. there is that which is shaped out of
action and not ideas. an idea of hammering a nail and the action of hammering
a nail. the action of bending the nail against the idea of driving in the
nail.
so what?
a simple
action and a multiple of possibilities of ideas.
and he
thinks about how he thinks too damn much. he views the world through compound
eyes that see a variety of images of what is and what is not in a variety
of combinations. each point is an axis splintering each line into webs
of possibilities. and splintering again and again toward infinity. for
every point there is a universe of possibilities. yet in all of this there
is a course of events determined by actions.
and he
thinks about how he thinks too much about what doesn't matter. possibility
is nonsense. possibility is meaningless gibberish. there is what is. there
is what is not. there is what happens - events determined by actions. ideas
about actions and events are nonsense. ideas might cause actions which
determine events but the actions act by and of themselves.
oh well.
ho-hum.
drowning
in a sea of nonsense. drowning into a realm of oblivion. in oblivion one
finds oneself as it is the oblivion of all else but oneself. one has thought
oneself as this or that or the other thing but this and that and the other
thing disappear into oblivion. and at the end oblivion disappears into
oblivion and all that is left is oneself. one discovers that oneself is
oblivion and nothing has disappeared that was not oneself all along that
one had believed and perceived was this and that and the other thing.
and on
and on and all such cosmic trash.
he goes
in or out awhile or so following this or that tangent and returns again
to where and when he's just sitting writing in the cafe here and now. he
tries to organize all this business into some sort of order. he doesn't
know quite how. he doesn't know quite why except for feeling that it should
be so otherwise it's meaningless and subsequently worthless. he thinks
about where this feeling might originate from. part of it originates externally
from others having told him that unless whatever he or anyone else is doing
is organized into some sort of order it is meaningless and worthless. things
should have worth. worth comes from meaning. meaning comes from order.
order comes from organization. this may or may not be true. this may or
may not be important.
what
he tries to determine is how he feels about it. part of that is his response
to that external influence from the others. part of him is his acceptance
of this idea and his desire to mimic it and incorporate it to please the
others. part of it is his rejection of it and his desire to avoid being
influenced by it and having it become a part of himself. part of him just
doesn't know which.
what
plays into this is how it affects his social relationships with others
and how it affects his internal relationship with himself. he examines
it to the extent to how much he is able to examine his feelings about it
other than this external influence and whatever feelings he may have in
connection to that external influence. this type of examination is next
to impossible to conduct because there is little that is not externally
influenced.
so he
makes some attempt to at least imagine how he might feel about the idea
without having been influenced by it from others. he thinks about whether
he would have come up with the idea on his own based on his own experience.
how does
one draw the line on where and when there is external influence and what
form it takes? one doesn't have to be actually told the idea itself. it
is implied by language and the use of language.
when
most organization is disorganized. when most order is disordered. when
most meaning is meaningless. when most worth is worthless.
what?
all this
is in the mind. the minds of influence passed on from one to another. and
how but by language?
the language
of the mind - the human mind. organization, order, meaning, worth.
and of
course reward and punishment.
so to
come into the world influenced impossible even before this idea by such
development the idea being and one intuitive into the foundation of without
substance thinking and mind question reach cannot do so without one does
attempt employing understood or explained either contained within and used
because this would imply somehow natural function the brain without being
not having been uninfluenced by others and that were supposes somehow know
this for certain the idea isolated not to have occurred various recognize
itself otherwise not able to be perceived pondering examinations cold philosophical
with any of it ill-equipped trodden paths is quantum zen explored arrive
to reach at the beginning and such as expect the same mapped these paths
return from no communication into oblivion and obstructed of everything
and worth organized some system in some particular understanding that then
offers and manner all rewards substitutes getting the reward another that
works does not until one receives it.
and so
on until he loses the point of anything.
blah
blah blah...
discovering
no system of no functioning of no understanding and gives no reward or
punishment.
he laughs
to arrive at this. what a joke. what was the idea?
systems
of whatnot.
systems
of controlling the uncontrollable.
all that
comes and goes in a passing breeze until something or another makes sense
- if it ever does.
but what
is this that all of this comes to?
will
he ever find out?
here
he sits scribbling away some sunday morning in the cafe drinking coffee
and smoking his cigarettes. it may not be much but it beats talking to
himself like so many other crazy people do but which he also does from
time to time which he observes even not crazy people doing more and more
but then one thinks about who and what is crazy then.
but could
he talk to anyone about what he is writing about?
who?
why?
how?
for him
this all leads to nowhere that is everywhere and all things that are and
are not. any talk about it would ultimately lead to silence. so silence
is where it should begin and continue. one hears a pin drop across the
universe. it's where he feels at home.
but to
the others it seems that they think it all leads to oblivion.
oh well.
he sees
no one where he's at. not even god has shown up. he wonders what's keeping
it.
all others
stop outside the gate and won't pass through. he steps through alone. back
to the garden which to them is oblivion.
and maybe
it is.
who cares?
the yawning
mouth.
they
run away.
trickery
and deception toward the destruction of all that they believe in.
oh well.
they
barely escape at the last moment and will never come this way again. never.
now they
avoid him like something like death.
he laughs.
the expression of confusion and fear that would come over their faces they
would then try to hide and hold their heads up to some aloof height they
would look down at him from.
avoidance
and denial.
the light
shines upon their inflated selves and casts him into the darkness of shadows.
they
have pushed him and everyone out of their way to get to this light. this
light of salvation. this light of forgiveness. this light that is their
reward.
they
fear the darkness of shadows where he has found his peace.
shunned.
forbidden.
dog poo.
theirs
is the crowning achievement of creation that they do not even understand.
he laughs
and shakes his head.
the light
is blinding so they shade their eyes with images and symbols and myths
of every imagination.
and this
is oblivion.
light
that is only reflection of image.
he has
his own light.
he has
his own reflection.
he has
his own image.
these
scribblings are outline traces of it.
sort
of.
it's
all as senseless as it appears.
huh?
what
the fuck?
nevermind.
unable
to hold a thought in his head for more than 2 seconds he returns to the
house on the island. tuna fish breath on the singer's voice who sings the
songs of the dead. but what surprises him the most is the choices people
- his fellow humans - make based on their free will. but is it not manufactured
to function a particular way and free will is a myth? one would not expect
a toaster to receive television signals. one would not expect a sofa to
wash one's laundry. humans too function to how they are manufactured. if
humans are in error then whose error is it? who manufactured humans according
to certain design? or who was not able to manufacture humans to a certain
design?
so he
doth ponders ponderingly what is the nature of this worshipped light behind
the images held before it? what is the perfect and wonderful thing believed
in? what is it that radiates and shines forth from the adoration of its
worshippers to bath them in its glory, yet to one who does not sing its
praises it remains dark and empty? is it the source of ourselves? can it
be called the creator? or is it we would create it out of ourselves as
we have been created from the mindless happenstance of forces that spontaneously
erupted from the fabric of nothingness? or is there another explanation?
it does
might exist even if it exists only as a product of our imagination its
existence cannot be denied. if it can be described it exists. and it has
been in some form or another the guiding force of humanity since we entered
into consciousness if not before. we perceive such light in our minds and
will sacrifice all to it, even ourselves.
rutabaga,
baby.
so the
fundamental complexity to it that leads one out of the social matrix and
into one's own hollow void hidden in such spaces one is able to discover
between those pathways engraved in one's consciousness by one's mere association
with the others one finds oneself surrounded by from the hour of one's
birth and arrival what may constitute one's tabla rasa or original zen
state by the steady transmissions of behavioral systems communicated by
every movement and touch and the voiced inflection of the spoken word long
before there is any understanding of supposed meaning that for the most
part directly contradicts the former impression the preverbal understanding
from this first impression is formed by one's emotions rather than by one's
mind and thoughts as the words attach themselves to one's intellect the
emotional impression is pushed down and submerged infused and this is one's
gut level feelings of occurrences that are denied by the words one has
come to understand that explain these occurrences in terms of what we would
wish these occurrences and our actions that create them to be we all suffer
from this delusion we all wish the opposite of what is there is the reality
of the public domain which exists in our words we speak to one another
individually however we recognize the falseness of this reality by the
churning of our emotions that have been pushed under our conscious awareness
by the words crowding into our minds the emotions have no verbal outlet
as do our thoughts we may speak what we think but not as we feel what we
feel is expressed by the shaping of the words we speak and by the mannerisms
that coincide with our speaking them and by our other actions that follow
a different course than that charted by our words.
so how
do we speak of such things our feelings perceive?
it would
seem that each of us recognize this discrepancy alone and in isolation
in our own private personal space where our soul resides if it were we
have souls or are souls and it happens that this might be recognized and
communicated between a couple or a few of us together when it is that we
find another or others we might become closely acquainted with sharing
the same space and time yet that recognition and communication is most
very fragile and delicately balanced and requires nearly constant diligent
work to maintain on everyone's concerned part these open and share their
souls they are naked and reveled to one another the usual armor and weaponry
is laid down there is no other state between two or more people remotely
comparable to this when it is attained yet one unintentional false move
on the part of one or the other instantly destroys it with a chain reaction
of quick defensive maneuvers this false move may be the raising of an eyebrow
a turn of the hand a word spoken too soon or to late or left unspoken anything
perhaps it does not even originate from any of the parties involved but
blows in on a breeze from without anything can bring this house down this
house cannot be built out of concrete or contract it is ethereal it exists
in an intangible sphere no physical sense can perceive.
one can
ultimately only trust oneself and many of us cannot do even that and if
one trusts oneself without a great high degree of doubt one is a fool begging
to be deceived and misled.
doubt
is his only remaining faith. and he doubts his doubt above all else he
may doubt.
and with
this he is removed from the world and himself into what lies beyond description
that he experiences and knows as such overflowing joy and comforting peace.
dust
to dust and ashes in our hands alone.
holy
fucking christ.
another
day in the merrie month of october (though it's actually the 10th month
not the 8th). time moves along. time moves through space. time shapes space.
or space moves time through itself as a medium to shape itself. or something.
he writes
along the edges of this and that and the other thing without it ever entering
into something definite. he uses a fork to stir his coffee. this and that
and the other thing are present as given to the situation. this and that
and the other thing are available as given to be used in the present given
situation. also one's understanding of what is given in what is present
and available and one's resources and ability to change and alter what
is given.
the endless
analysis and discussion of this along the edges of science or philosophy
or magick or poetry or art or whatever else is present and available and
understood.
and what
can be stated to be the net result of the gross accumulation of the mass
of dada? what is the desired net result? what is the perceived net result?
what is the actual net result?
can there
be any? does the interaction of all that is given and used in the entirety
of the situation end in or produce a net result? or is a net result arbitrarily
and subjectively taken out of it for one's own particular purpose and intention?
he ponders
ponderingly again and continingly about what all this is and how it goes
together and works in and of itself into mind thing hoo-ha twist and shout
perplexed zimbo-dee-da and in terms of the other - always the others -
and himself both in relationship with it and each other.
he thinks
he'll draw a circle around it. though inside the circle may not be what
it is but at least what he is able to comprehend and understand about what
it is. but he finds that he cannot even draw that circle. he ends up drawing
this line that goes almost every which way in its pursuit to include even
just what he can comprehend. it turns into a jumble of scribbling without
any sense of direction or purpose. and he turns another page and tries
it again.
yet there
are those who do draw circles around things. and they proclaim that these
circles not only include what they comprehend and understand but all that
is to be comprehended and understood.
he ponders
ponderingly whether it is he who is stupid or them. one or the other doesn't
get it. one or the other is entirely off and wandering lost in one's own
illusions. or maybe not. perhaps both are correct.
what
is the fucking truth?
and he
bangs his head against that wall for awhile.
then
he lights another cigarette.
excuse
me but have we met?
would
you like to place another bet?
is there
any need to fret?
what
is caught when we cast our net?
do we
have enough or is there more yet?
do we
continue just to pay our debt?
will
we only find more to regret?
or something
to finally make things set?
it's all
wet. it's all flat on its face and over its head pulled in by the power
and weight of that which it has sought to pull into itself and gain power
and weight from.
ha-ha-hee-heeeee...
the clown
doth laugh as the acrobats tumble and plummet to their death with their
tangled apparatus following crashing down on top of them.
so here
we are far away from home at the circus fair and the clowns become our
rulers by default in the absence of the others who have eliminated themselves
by over-extending themselves with their daring deeds and not looking back
to check to see if what worked for them once will work for them again still.
and the
clowns pile into a tiny little car and it drives around in crazy circles
then explodes into a ball of flames. the crowd stands aghast, then cheers.
are we
free yet?
have
we overcome those who would subjugate us by the marvelous use and display
of what are merely tricks of the trade?
can we
leave now?
can we
go home?
or does
the circus continue?
does
it continue without an audience?
do generals
march to war if armies do not follow? do leaders shout commands and chant
slogans in empty halls or on empty streets? do kings and queens live in
palace fortresses if no one builds them? do priests perform the sacred
rituals if no one comes to be blessed and saved? do stores remain open
and place ads in the media if no one buys what they sell?
we mummer
and complain about the generals, the leaders, the kings and queens, the
priests, the store owners, about all the dastardly ways they cheat and
oppress us yet we play audience to them anytime any one of them comes to
town. we stand in line to buy tickets for the show. we fight among ourselves
for front row seats.
can these
few be blamed for stepping in and acting out our desires and fantasies
when the house rises to a standing ovation and shouting for encores? and
how many are willing to take their place if they did step down? how many
among ourselves? how many are lured by the spotlight of our undivided attention?
what if our attention was elsewhere?
yeah,
right, he says to himself while sitting here scribbling and smoking time
away.
yeah
- fucking right.
right
the fuck on.
he laughs
in his head.
in his
head he laughs.
the others
do what they do to get paid and laid while he sits here among them dancing
around in the playground in his head.
off with
his head.
pull
his head out of his ass and put it on the block. chop it off. put it on
a stake and parade it around town rejoicing and celebrating victory over
the beast.
and as
he is executed what might his last words be?
thank
you. thank you, good people. thank you for helping me accomplish what i
was unable to accomplish for myself. i was too afraid. i was too conceited
and selfish. i was too stupid and ignorant. i was too greedy. i am sick
and insane. i am twisted and demented. i am an aberration of what it is
to be human - if it can even be said that i am human. it would not take
much to convince me that i am not. let us say that i am not. who wants
to argue?
but allow
me to speak no more. i waste time with my insensible babbling before you
and further forestall your liberation from my kind. my last words shall
be a hope and a prayer that with me you have found out the last hidden
among yourselves who has been a constant threat and hindrance to your glory
and progress. may all the gods and forces of the universe bless you always
and forever.
but,
for now, the show must go on.
let's
do it.
thank
you all.
and the
drums roll. and the blade comes down. and the cymbals crash and the trumpets
blare. and the gathered crowd lets go a wild cheering and jump up and down
and hug and kiss and dance and shed tears and all their burdens and worries
and cares and clothing and there is a frenzy of delighted abandoned fucking
until the cows come home.
this
is it.
who would
have thought that anyone would ever live to see this day? how many prophets
from the world over had predicted themselves hoarse about it? how many
believed and struggled without hope and against the odds of the misguided
majority against them?
how long?
how long?
how long?
since
before the dawn of memory. since before even the days when the proto-humanoids
dropped from the trees and began this eternal searching quest. since before
all the dreamtimes put together.
since
forever.
and now
before everyone's eyes it has come appearing as real as life itself. more
real than life itself.
all the
world for all it had disagreed on and fought with itself over for time
immemorial it has finally come upon this one thing all could wholeheartedly
agree on.
that
this worthless waste of time of a person taking up space should be once
and for all killed and destroyed and never allowed to come and return again.
that any and all trace of this person and that which brought this person
into being should be entirely eliminated.
and this
agreement opened the door to lay all other disagreements to rest.
and that
should be the end. it is the end as most stories like this are written
that are believed in by the masses. that is how the circles are completed.
yet they are circles of snakes swallowing their own tails. the circles
cannot stop being completed. once one follows a path that is marked by
what is good and what is evil one becomes committed to that path. neither
good nor evil can be eliminated from it as one cannot exist without the
other. for who follows the path leading to victory there must always be
the other to be defeated forever.
but is
this a path that we create or a path that is created for us?
this
great labyrinth that only leads back into itself. the great labyrinth that
has its pathways in our minds. we may come to peace with it but we may
never escape it.
even
this god that might be is in the labyrinth and has the labyrinth within
it. it too may come to peace with the labyrinth but it too may not escape
it. not without ceasing to exist. that is the only door to anyone human
and god both alike.
and so
his writing follows this every which way path within the labyrinth as the
labyrinth is within it. the labyrinth is everywhere. any and all directions
to and from any and all points are paths within the labyrinth. in this
way the labyrinth does not exist in and of itself. it exists only when
we choose a path out of all the possible paths and follow it. then the
paths of the labyrinth are set within the possibilities from that path
we have chosen. yet at every point along that path we may again choose
from all the possibilities. yet out of this continuing choice of all possibilities
the probability of what we are apt to choose having chosen one path out
of all the others is restricted to the limits of that particular path we
have chosen continuing.
doubting
in one's own nonsense along about whatever one's own nonsense may or may
not be about. repeating this statement and various and sundry related to
it over and over. the incantation. the mantra. the formula.
and so
now what?
and so
he waits for his damnation to take effect. he is certain it has been pronounced.
it has to have been by now. he would damn himself if he were someone in
a position to do such a thing. but he is not. and so he waits. he waits
and scribbles and drinks coffee and smokes cigarettes. he goes home and
talks to ghosts and phantoms. or he watches tv. or designs pictures on
his computer. and he takes classes at the state university. and he spends
the hard working taxpayers' money he is given for fulfilling and performing
this given role for their benefit.
crack,
baby, crack.
and he lets loose whatever philosophy he has about it all which is basically the immense and overwhelming micro and macro level of absolute stupidity of it all that makes very little if any sense to him whatsoever except from some weird altered contradictingly skewed juxtapositional distorted perspective view it makes all too much perfect sense. as much sense as a wheel is round and it rolls. he is at times, when he allows himself awhile to think about it awhile, astounded by the logic of the illogic of it. it could be no other way. what other way other way could it be? there are trizillion ways it might and are imagined it could be. all left to the imagination. if not then what is our imagination for? and those who endlessly bitch themselves into sucidially depressed states about it all.
and so
now what?
and so
the scribbling continues. the words concerning this and that and the other
thing still roam in his head as he watches those others around him.
and so
he writes to no one - not even himself. he wouldn't read any of this. what
for? there is no useful imformation. no story. bad poetry. it has nothing
to do with discovering anything. it has nothing to do with gaining freedom,
pleasure, joy, power, authority. it has nothing to do with any sort of
enlightenment or realization. it just maintains itself. it perpetuates
itself. until he dies. when he dies it will stop. unless he finally just
fucking gives up before then. and then dies.
one should
just live and enjoy living.
the mysteries
remain mysteries. the mysteries today are the same mysteries that were
yesterday and will be tomorrow. for whatever reason they are out of our
reach. all the whys to it all.
oh boy.
ho-hum.
one does
what one can do in one's life. one discovers. one gains freedom, pleasure,
joy, power, authority. one becomes enlightened and realized.
one climbs
whatever summit one can.
now what?
one plays
a part in the play. it is the play that is the thing, not oneself. though
one will always view the thing as being oneself. one is always center stage
and the play is the background. even if one plays the part of one who is
selfless. one as being selfless is center stage in one's view of the play.
nothing else is as important as whatever one is doing.
and we
become absorbed in it and ourselves.
he is
absorbed into playing a part of someone who is only playing a part.
where
does the actor and the act begin and end?
dig.
dig on
the groove of the thing, baby. dig on the smooth bumpiness of the groove.
dig on the sharp jaggedness of the groove. let it throw one up and down
and knock one around and cut and tear at one's flesh and heart and mind.
that's what the thing is about, baby. it ain't no easy ride on some silver
glider somewhere between the earth and clouds.
dig it.
or don't
dig it.
dig it
not digging it.
just
dig it.
find
out what it is for oneself even if that may come up to be the most horrible
ugly foul-smelling putrid nasty thing that could ever exist and dig it.
dig not digging it if that's all there is and that is what it takes to
dig something. the main thing is to dig. but there seems to be a short
supply of sweet nice fluffy flowing fancy free things to go around for
us to all have something like that to dig. but digging something like that
is a drop in the hat for one to dig because digging something like that
is down right instinctive and requires no thought or effort at all. but
to not come up with something like that and use it as an excuse not to
dig is stupid.
there
are so many uncountable amounts of things readily available in some manner
and form of existence and the vast majority may not be much of anything
in and of themselves one might think to dig but just as much the vast majority
of them are not anything that are so entirely impossible to dig either.
not everything is milk and honey, but not everything is piss and shit either.
most stuff is just ordinary whatever within the confines of the extremes
of things.
the thing
about digging something is not so much dependent or even concerned with
the object of what is being dug but the act and experience of digging itself.
that's the thing to dig - digging something. what that something is is
secondary at best and more often is irrelevant to the digging itself.
in the
absence of having something one feels worthwhile to dig one can just pick
up a rock and dig it. there is nothing about the rock to dig except it
just being a rock like any other common easy to find rock. it is not a
diamond. it is not gold or silver or a gem of any kind or a meteorite,
though by random chance it might be if that so happens. it's not the quality
of the rock but the quality of one digging it and the experience digging
it.
and so
what does one have? one has something that one digs in a world of others
who don't seem to dig anything. and it's just a dumb rock.
but whatever...
he writes
beginning with something that seems obvious and follows the obvious and
proceeds toward the obvious and he'll write along that way for awhile and
look back and see that he's written down nothing but what is obvious. and
he stops. is there a point to his continuing to write when what is being
written is obvious? who would read it? yet what do they read otherwise?
what do they talk about? what is all of this that they deal with that makes
them so unhappy and unfulfilled but the obvious? what is all that confuses
them but the obvious?
that
would seem to be the thing that it is not obvious. they may say that it's
this or that or the other thing but this and that and the other thing are
just make-believe. this or that or the other thing may be given as reasons
why one cannot dig anything but what prevents them from picking up a rock
or picking up a spoon or something as common as that or even just thinking
about something as common as that and digging it?
what
prevents them from doing that is thinking that a rock or a spoon or some
other common object whatever is not anything one can or should dig. they
instead imagine digging something they do not have and cannot get and become
determined that if they do not have this thing they do not have and cannot
get that is something they can and should dig then they won't dig anything.
and they pass all the rocks and spoons and all the common things in this
world and don't dig any of it.
one can
just dig. one finds the way to dig and to dig at the most optimal level
one is able to dig one forgets about all else but digging itself. for itself.
one needs no object to dig. or one may dig any object one comes across
as it comes for the time it presents itself and when it is gone one digs
something else. digging in motion. this way one does not even have to have
a rock or a spoon or anything specific however common to dig. one just
digs.
but what
divides this from oneself and removes it from one's reach is the group.
when one subjects oneself to that which the group tells one to dig over
that which one digs oneself.
the group
usually digs that which only a few in the group determine what to dig.
and this is usually something that these few of the group have and the
others - the majority - do not. and these others join the group and follow
the group and its rules - again determined by the few - in hopes of attaining
what the few of the group tell them to dig. this is how the few control
the many and the many allow themselves to be controlled. and why would
they allow it if they didn't dig somehow?
but this
has a strong hold on our hearts and minds. we are a collective species
though we admire the individual in the ideal if not in reality. the individual
is usually a pain in the ass.
the almighty
group and hoopla hoopla oink oink...
but what is any of that to him? the line is drawn between it and him - between them and him. but the line is fuzzy and unclear. out of focus. how is he to know where he stands? he doesn't care where he stands. if he's part of the group then he's part of the group. if he's an individual (part of that group?) then he's an individual. he himself doesn't say he is this and not that except to say that he is someone who doesn't say he is this and not that and not one who does say he is this and not that.
dripping
dropping from zero into infinity he saw himself sliding past himself while
his eyes were exploding. this was in a moment elongated and superimposed
upon other moments backward and veering off a bit sideways. from the other
view his eyes were imploding and being saturated by blazing full spectrums
of invisible light. the clocks were spinning. a flock of doves flew away
and become flaming suns fading into the glowing darkness.
he walked
through strange hallways that seemed unending. yet there was a time when
he was not walking but was lying on a bed and staring up at a white stucco
ceiling that was swirling around like a galaxy. but he did not know if
this was before or after the other or if either were in the same time line.
sequence was jagged. he wondered if it had always been and what had given
him the idea that it wasn't supposed to be that way. it was something these
one people were telling him once who seemed to exist in only one world
plane which part of his existence and/or consciousness passed over and
through. yes. that was it. they were afraid of so much happening around
them that they could not explain. they mumbled chants and prayers to what
they called gods who they begged to protect them.
we were
considered demons in that world. we were cast out by magicians and put
to death by priests. we find a place of refuge where we might live without
too many questions being seriously asked by the others. though we are never
fully accepted we are not actively condemned. if we remain quiet we are
safe. and meanwhile we can concentrate on other areas our existence and/or
consciousness extends to.
a door
opens and closes at once. one who is and who is not steps through. there
is joy and sorrow. he remembers what is not about to happen. there is the
crisscross nature of these events. there are the multi-sources of origins
which are not the true origins but are the points of the crisscross of
events.
a saucer
full of secrets.
we have
had to invent various diagrams representing our understanding based upon
appearances that we judge by the ratio of hits and misses. to improve the
seeming accuracy of those diagrams we have invented we circumscribe certain
limits to the parameters of the context to which they are to be applied
and from which observed data is to be derived. and this is our magick and
science that we hold to be the highest accomplishment of our thinking because
it produces an abundance of material wonders that bedazzle the senses and
cause us pleasure.
but what
does this magick and science really do but to further confine us to this
world plane when once we would soar above and below and around it in spaces
that our now refined magick and science has defined as impossible and sealed
off from our minds?
that
other time is now referred to as a childhood of fearful ignorance. what
was there to fear? what was it we were ignorant of? is there no fear now?
is there no ignorance?
there
were risks then as there are now. there were great and grave dangers. and
there was the darkness of the unknown as there is now. one could find oneself
very much lost and alone.
but how
many more possibilities exist in one's imagination over one's knowledge
of facts?
and he
is blank.
but buzz
zip knew nothing of this. he was still wondering about what happened to
dog plasma. he stopped by zed's and told her what he saw happen. zed listened.
yeah, she said, this sort of stuff happens all the time. i've seen some
weird shit myself and heard about a lot more. there's any number of theories
people have put together about all of it. i've known some people who have
driven themselves nuts trying to figure it out and piece it together into
something that makes sense. and go to any bookstore and there'll be shelves
and shelves about this theory and that one. the mistake they all make,
it seems to me, is that they assume that there is a singular cause and
subsequently purpose to it. that's where they lose me. i don't deny that
this shit is going on or even that it's connected together directly or
indirectly but not from one single source. as radical and outlandish as
these people promote themselves as being, they seem entirely unwilling
to drop that ages old classic archaic assumption. i don't get it. you know,
here we are in the future and everything and they're all stuck in the past
way of thinking feeding new variables into the same old paradigm. they're
still into uni-everything. what about multi-everything?
but he
got tired of writing about this. it was as pointless as everything else
he was writing. a story about nothing. it turns out that the thing that
dog was always playing with was a rutabaga that he kept sticking various
things into. the woman who shot him and picked it up was an alien agent
named josephine. she shot him because he was on the point of discovering
hyperdrive and had he done so the aliens who josephine worked for would
no longer have a cheap source of rutabagas from earth and we would be one
more species capable of interstellar space travel and competitors to their
markets. there were too many as it was.
then
there was an explosion.
it comes
at some point that will be the last. but each point is the last. nothing
is returned to again. and there are some points that are never arrived
at either.
being
human is an interesting thing. it is so much but yet it is so little. to
be in this state where so much is imagined and desired. this awareness
of possibility and there is no conceivable way of arriving at it. to be
in the limitless limited human mind.
but there's
another version of the story where buzz did record dog's mumblings. after
he had gone to zed's he went home to listen to them.
he was
surprised by what he heard. faint but clear dog muttered, they're gonna
kill me, man. fucking kill me, man. i know it. i sense it. before i can
figure out the puzzle to the shazam thing, you know? because it's not in
their plan. it's in some other plan. that's where i gotta get to - the
other plan. but i'm dead. my nose is all over the place and that bitch
is stealing my... whatever it is. the shazam thing. she's got the space
spooks all conjured up with her. you wanna find them, go find her. i can't
because i'm dead, man.
that's
weird, buzz said to himself.
we are
here. we are all within our separate heads in a space that is subjectively
the same space that we look out from to the others who are as ourselves
each looking out to the others who are us.
and all
that business. all analyzed and recorded and set in place to collect dust
and be buried or out in the wind and worn away.
following the winding way that is not always clearly seen and when it is does not always mean that one is not lost. at times one is most blind when one sees the light.
bringing things from one another in order of what impossible groupings what the human mind may grasp and hold beyond the limits of the reality it is presented with.
from broken
wings to flight as dizzying fragments of thoughts and ideas and concepts
gather and disperse within that all-inclusive mind sphere that one knows
everything one knows in that is the surrounding world surrounded by one's
mind. what is the difference between this and that and the other thing
one might wonder without knowing that is something one is wondering.
as has
been long discovered and stated, language is dada. the moment with vibrational
familiarity beset by strange changes. have we been here before? is today
the day day as yesterday? will today remain tomorrow?
thanks
for all the fishes, mr. and mrs. wilson. thanks for the crucifixion. it
arrived in the needed moment despite numerous delays in its departure.
we are
the donkeys among the splendid mounts once ridden by cowardly men of great
courage. their belligerent stupidity was our inspiration.
we designed
the machine in order that all else might be destroyed. then we lived and
lived while it was built building itself. the masses have so many hands.
they are kept busy but still manage to do the devil's work. who is the
savior? who are the saved?
and where
does this machine stand? where does it not stand?
there
is a theory to this nonsense scribbled here by this certain fool who is
our messenger - who also is considered and considers himself to be mad.
madness
is a tricky thing. its substance less substantial than ethereal sub-particle
matter and energy. it is a map to buried treasure written in coded metaphors
and drawn in representational symbols - images from the nightmarish dark
gray dream past, the river flowing into many distant futures of probability,
a delta before the sea.
these
are memoirs of madness. i am i because i know who i am. my little dog is
barking at someone who fills its food bowl by the light of the bright pale
moon. nothing is confused here. confusion is precise and exact - and exacting.
it demands our immediate attention. it demands our obedience to our immediate
attention. it offers up no single clue in the multitude of clues it graciously
offers.
salvation
is a mystery. in and of itself it does not exist. it a creation of despair.
despair is the creation of the non-existence of salvation. this is the
theory. the theory goes on forever searching for easy answers instead of
proof.
this
is the circumnavigated territory of the wandering mind. a mind loosed among
wild and savage constructions of thoughts. thoughts as thick as a brick.
sitting
in a cafe no man scratches his beard wondering who he might be at any moment.
he writes out these words others may never read. and if they do will they
know more or less than what they did in a previous state of mind?
a question.
a substitute for knowledge. knowledge is a rock tumbling into a chasm of
ignorance. look out below! questions give flight to these broken wings
of our fallen angel. the angel pronounced to be beyond salvation. an angel
innocent in sin. an angel knowing how pointless it all is to be disheartened.
a breath
of smoke from his mouth. a cigarette burning between his fingers.
this
angel who was expected to perform miracles. this angel who is human and
only that which one being human is. this human who imagines and deludes
himself into entertaining this idea that he is this fallen angel. how human
a thing that is. how romantically tragic.
meanwhile
he searches through that which his madness presents for him to search through.
to be human is to search. and searching itself is the purpose of this searching.
to find anything is a disappointment that leads to despair because the
search is over. what a ghetto utopia is. what hell is heaven. he prays
to god almighty not to save him. he implores with tears that the lord might
spare him that damnation. and he thanks and loves the ever-merciful one
that answers all prayers.
flocks
of busy bees buzzing hovering over the flowered fields. each in turn dives
into the maw of sweet delightful raptured nectar. to be a busy bee or not
to be a busy bee. is that a question? the skull just always grins. what
does it care? it is free of this thickness of flesh oozing with brews of
emotion wired and sparking the brain with impulses fireworking into the
convoluted cerebral tangled network of thought that gives rise to this
i am beast thing grunting while it eats and shits and falls asleep and
fucks something once in awhile or simulates same.
do we
answer this call? do we enter into this situation? do we lazily sit back
and view it on the big screen eating our popcorn and slurping our sodas?
let's
see that jew hung up again. we can't get enough of that. let's see a slow
motion close up of the nails being driven in. the blood and sweat dripping
from his thorny clown crown. let's hear these stupid people jeer and let's
gaze upon those among them who stand entranced by the blinding revelation
of complete and total incomprehension some call understanding.
the delicious
imagining of what that pain must have felt like. pain so great that only
one's ability to forgive might overcome. to be in that mind - that space
of reality that pain revels ever so sharpened and clearly. and in the final
moment of one's endurance to speak the words that part that reality as
though one were walking through a morning mist.
the fallen
angel buddha with a halo of nirvana around him everywhere he goes. this
divine madness hated by those who are caught in the world and its ravaging
idiocy designed out of their competing desires and fears against one another
and themselves.
but that's
an old hat we wear. we come into this and play a part and then we leave.
we are another gear in the machine turning along with the others. we are
saints and we are sinners. we represent the highest good and the lowest
evil. we abide in heaven and burn in hell. we worship god and dance with
satan. we move through this and that and the other thing. it parts around
us like water around a rock until we are eventually worn away and become
part of the water.
and no
man understands this. he is here and not here. he laughs at those who chase
and try to gather the material for the new jerusalem. he laughs at those
letting go and trying to fade into the wilderness. and no man neither goes
one way nor the other. no man remains in the moment passing him by showing
him the wonder and confusion of creation conjured by the wonderful and
confused creator that may be merely himself playing tricks on himself.
guess
again.
there
was the time before time. it is time experienced in a different way by
a different sense. and it leads one to a different understanding.
but it's
not just the time before time, though in a certain aspect of itself it
can be stated that it to have been before or is before or will be before.
this is only in terms of time which in another aspect of itself it is not.
time is its face, its appearance. time is the manifestation of it.
to speak
to the fools who have no way of comprehending what one speaks to them about.
it is like speaking to the images projected on a screen in a movie. they
will hear what they hear and say what they say and they will do what they
do. they have no choice. they not only cannot comprehend anything other
than that but they cannot even conceive of anything other than that. not
only does the understanding of the idea not occur to them but the idea
that there is a idea to understand does not either.
it's
from a thousand thoughts combining together for a moment that the idea
occurs. the idea is not singular though there are singular things within
the idea.
the which
way of things. the abundance of all manner of thought. the oneness - but
not oneness as in terms or parameters or conditions of inclusiveness and/or
exclusiveness nor oneness in the sense of a harmonizing whole though it
is ultimately a harmonious whole of cacophony clashing division and conflicting
contradiction.
a madness
ensues toward itself. there is an opening to the sea where seekers of wisdom
have escaped through to drown themselves in overwhelming waves of ignorance.
the machine
is powered by the lowest common denominator. that is the pendulum that
drives its mainspring. the machine's mainspring has long been broken, locked
in rusted tangles. the mainspring of the machine is the gordian knot hacked
at by the sword of incomprehension. it is the hissing snakes of the gorgon's
hair.
the machine
is god if we let it. it is the resurrection and the anti-christ on a stick.
it is the bottomless pit which is the foundation of the new jerusalem.
there
are no towers. there are no heights. these are inventions by those who
wish for something that is above and beyond and more than themselves to
worship and idolize.
what
god but a human god?
what
machine but a human machine?
10/29
the melting
permanence of non-existence as he sits in the cafe writing words such as
the melting permanence of non-existence. the mismatch mix of conceptual
images describing altered mutations composed of blocks of definitions.
what happened
to the story? was there a story? what happened to all the business about
what may or may not be going on either in reality or in his head?
it comes
back to asking if there is a point to it. why a point? what does a point
do for it? do we always need a point? what sort of freedom is that?
he lives
in a world with people in it. but he has no faith in any of it. it seems
to him to be bent on self-destruction. but that is never the end. something
unexpected survives the final holocaust that even god cannot predict. that
infinitesimal impossibility overlooked by a blind eye. some warm-blooded
rat thing scurrying around with the dinosaurs comes to dominate the earth
when the cumbersome big lizards drop and die. that sort of thing.
god bless
the cockroach.
he thinks,
what survives from me? i am a father and now a grandfather. i will be gone
rotting in the organic compost feast. what continues and survives from
me - either from my genes or feeding on my flesh?
there
is only destruction of our sense of permanence. otherwise all is eternal.
at the
outset the machine incurs a rapid plasmatic void of dissemenial premeditative
proto-occurances circulated among anthropomorphic conceptual gestalt systems.
this quasi-process is masked by operative reality implants at discreet
logistical sequential locations such that an illusionary screen is maintained
between the perceiver and that which is perceived, which is the machine
itself. thus the machine by its very nature creates itself as it is not.
what it is not in its natural state is something which is. ergowise that
which is is not the machine but a manifestation of the machine. and this
manifestation appears as designed and generated by the machine as anything
and everything but the machine. this extends so far as to also include
the use of the term, the machine, and all descriptions thereof. we only
call it the machine. that should not confuse one into thinking that it
is a machine. it could be anything. it could be zebra - or a snake in a
garden.
the machine
in one aspect exists as theory. this should not dispel one into thinking
- don't think! - that the machine in existing in one aspect as theory that
it is not substantial. it is substantial in the manifestation it generates
out of this one aspect of it being theory though the manifestation is not
the machine itself except that it is.
it takes
a practiced mind to conceive of this. it takes a practiced mind well versed
in doubt to be able not only to conceive of it but to design the damn thing
to begin with. and then one needs the practiced mind to comprehend it.
comprehension of the conception of the machine and its one aspect of existing
as theory that generates a manifestation of itself that is not itself but
is a substantial image of itself not being itself can only follow from
doubt. it is one's doubt that allows one this freedom that leads to the
comprehension - any comprehension. without that doubt one is left with
only the machine's manifestation as a basis for reality.
and it
is reality. none of this should imply or be inferred to mean that the reality
around us that we are within and interconnected with is not real and that
there is some other hidden reality more subtle that exists behind, beneath
or beyond it. it should not be mistaken that that is what we are describing.
that is what is described and promoted by others in other various camps
and schools. our own opinion of that sort of thing is that they are full
of shit. what is the point of another reality? what the fuck are we doing
here in this one then? to learn the error of our ways? what the fuck is
that? a joke? but then we don't know from nothing about that at all. it
is just our opinion. take it or shove it. we don't care.
glittering green fishes floundering upon the shores of our dreams as we discuss different forms of vibrational energy that might appear as shifts of light and shadow taking up arms against the latest ongoing insurrection devised out of the minds of dishwashers. there is a clock on the wall. the hands point out the time commonly understood as 11:34 am. there is an implied beginning and ending and a regular linear sequence of segmented moments in-between.
the ever-flowing
state of mind jumping off the bridge spanning the constant void. we flash
between the light and shadow against any proposed logical conclusion. it
is this nature of our madness that has divine aspirations above and beyond
the call of reason. it's an easy trick to play. one merely needs to fool
oneself. the benefit of doubt supersedes the suspension of belief. the
gods rage at this invasion into their domain. we come upon them innocently
and pass them unharmed. we are neither for them nor against them. we find
them useful at times. at other times we find that we have quite forgotten
them.
our laughter
strikes to the marrow as we dance without moving in the fields where once
these gods played. now the fields lay beneath tract houses. now the missiles
are poised toward every direction it is feared from which the enemy will
attack. the enemy is everywhere. we are everywhere. we must be the enemy.
the sweet
girl on the balcony lifts her skirt. the boys below gaze upward with rising
erections as they imagine the lovely and terrible things they wish they
could perform with upon that which is reveled.
we play
chorus to this pantomime. we beat the drums and strike the gongs. we chant
as much as we can remember of the holy songs we were taught by the mistress
of knowledge, otherwise known as the whore of babylon, that are impossible.
we open and close the gates of never was and never will be. no one needs
to know. this is our secret. no one needs to know anything beyond what
they presently can gain knowledge of. we do not nor will we ever tell them
anything different. and there is no one here besides ourselves who might
know what there is to tell that is different.
to tell
them anything that which concerns ourselves is to invite ridicule that
they employ to maintain their denial mechanisms. one is able to perceive
at a glance who is one of them and who is one of us - though we are them.
each exposes one's identity openly by one's reaction and response to our
presence. there are those who frown and sneer and those who smile and nod.
simple as it seems.
goof:
what is the form of the disease we are suffering from?
prism:
in what sense do you mean disease?
goof:
i mean disease - dis-ease.
prism:
physical? emotional? psychic?
goof:
yes - all of those and then some. the whole general thing that derives
from a multitude of sources and has a multitude of symptoms.
prism:
it seems that you answered your own question.
goof:
i just further defined the question. i didn't answer it.
prism:
sometimes that's all an answer is - just a further definition of the question.
a differently worded restatement.
goof:
well maybe for some things. but this is a specific question needing a specific
answer.
prism:
perhaps - but i doubt that it will ever receive a specific answer.
goof:
well, nevermind - forget it.
prism:
glad to.
and they
sat on the fence awhile more with the moon hanging above and the television
glow from surrounding houses.
goof:
so now what?
prism:
so now whatever.
goof:
whatever? whatever what?
prism:
whatever is now.
goof:
which is?
prism:
am i a prophet?
goof:
why would you be a prophet?
prism:
exactly - why would i?
goof:
i didn't say you were.
prism:
but you are asking me questions one would ask a prophet and expecting me
to come up with answers.
goof:
i was just making conversation. it doesn't have to be that deep as that.
prism:
oh.
goof:
oh?
prism:
oh.
goof:
what do you mean?
prism:
now who's is searching for depth? i just said, oh. it's a perfectly common
sound made in response to a statement that usually indicates an affirmative
understanding or acknowledgment or whatever.
goof:
oh... well, is that all you have to say?
prism:
that was all i felt i needed to say.
goof:
it's hardly conversational.
prism:
we are having a conversation, are we not?
goof:
well, yeah - but you don't seem too interested in having one.
prism:
to some extent you may be right. i probably would not have started a conversation
had you not done so. but since you have and we are having one i am interested
in participating in it as much as feel i am able for it to continue. however,
if it ends, then it ends. in the meantime i enjoy this conversation as
much as i would enjoy almost anything else that might occur at this particular
moment.
goof:
even if i hit you in the head with a rock? you would enjoy that?
prism:
i don't quite understand your tangent. but, yes, there would be a certain
amount of enjoyment of kicking the shit out of you if you were to hit me
in the head with a rock - or i should say, attempt to hit me in the head
with a rock.
goof:
you would enjoy that?
prism:
my enjoyment would be momentary as it would be needed in response to the
circumstances. i would not be able to defend myself against your assault
if i did not feel some enjoyment in my actions. when one is threatened
or hurt then one is angered. when one is angered there is enjoyment to
inflict corresponding injury to the attacker, at least sufficient to cause
the attacker to stop and sometimes more than that to cause the attacker
to think twice about taking such action in the future. outside of that
particular circumstance i would not enjoy inflicting injury upon you or
anyone else. but i would also not feel bad about it if it were unavoidable.
i don't believe in guilt.
goof:
you wouldn't feel bad at all?
prism:
yes, i would. i would feel bad about the whole situation. i would consider
it unfortunate that it had happened. but if i felt my actions to be appropriate
to the circumstances then why should i feel bad about them? i might question
my needing to resort to violence, but that's not the same as feeling guilt.
goof:
well, i'm not going to hit you in the head with a rock.
prism:
yes, i know. you were just making conversation.
goof:
well, i suppose - but it was more than that. i wanted to engage you in
the conversation more than you just making minimal responses.
prism:
so you thought you would hit me in the head with a rock?
goof:
figuratively i suppose.
prism:
did you get the response you wanted? am i engaged?
goof:
i don't know if you are engaged even if you are engaged. you hold yourself
back even when you are the most responsive.
prism:
doesn't everybody?
goof:
i don't know. maybe.
prism:
don't you?
goof:
i don't think so.
prism:
there isn't a part of you that sits back and watches yourself as you act
in the world? i think even the most physical people have that. but maybe
not.
goof:
you mean the soul?
prism:
soul? i know very little about what might be a soul or not. maybe it is.
maybe in a zen sort of sense. but then i know very little about that either.
i don't know. i don't think it's anything as metaphysical as that. at least
i don't experience it as such. to me it's just there. i'm just there. it
very much everyday and ordinary. as much as breathing or my heart beating.
it's not something that i strive for like reaching a zen state or anything.
but then that's what i don't know anything about. and i can't say that
i particularly care about it either. i let others worry about that. i like
it where i'm at just fine. it all comes and goes. there's good stuff and
bad stuff. there's joy and sorrow. there's pleasure and pain. there's all
of most everything and its opposite and all in-between. and i've found
that it pretty much all balances out somehow for some reason. but i suppose
it has to otherwise it would fall over. where would we be then? there isn't
any real gain or loss, i don't think. not in the long run. and la-dee-da
and blah blah blah and all that hoopla oink oink coo-coo-ca-joob dada monkey
business that doesn't mean squat to a tree...
goof:
huh?
prism:
forget it.
goof:
no - i was following you up to that last part. what do you mean?
prism:
i mean that it's meaningless. it is what it is and ain't what it ain't.
it changes nothing and nothing changes it. it's a matter of one's perspective
of it - where one places oneself in it or finds oneself placed in it. if
it means something, then it means something. if it doesn't, then it doesn't.
it doesn't matter either way to anything - except to whoever sees meaning
in it, i suppose. though i could be wrong about any of this. maybe it is
all zen anyway.
goof:
so the bottom line is what?
prism:
bottom line? what bottom line? there isn't any. or there isn't one in theory
and that's all this is is one hopped up theory. the bottom line, i suppose,
is wherever anyone draws it. unless one wants to count death as the ultimate
bottom line. unless there some sort of existence or experience past that.
but i don't know. i haven't gotten that far yet.
goof:
you say it's just a theory but before you said it was as certain as your
experience of breathing or your heart beating.
prism:
i don't know if i was talking about the same thing each time, but can't
it be both? it's a theory of experience and an experience of theory. it's
a theory drawn from experience and experience drawn from theory. but i'm
now just playing with words. i'm opening and closing my mouth expelling
breath and making these sounds. i can do that because certain neurons are
firing in my brain and nervous system. they are firing because they are
stimulated by experience i am having and from previous experience that
formed certain learned patterns of response that have become more or less
automatic. there is belief on our parts that these patterns of sounds have
meaning. and they do. they describe this or that. we have enough similar
experience and can share that meaning. but if one of us speaks of an experience
that the other does not share then these meanings become vague or even
entirely lost.
goof:
i don't know about that. that's the one thing about words, they can describe
something that is new to one's experience.
prism:
up to a point. if you know what a cat is then i can describe a tiger to
you and you will more or less have an idea of what it is even without having
seen one. but as more of what is described cannot be described using words
that have familiar and shared meaning then that becomes less true. and
more so if what one is describing is something entirely abstract.
goof:
so you're saying that what you're describing cannot be described?
prism:
oh, i can describe it. i can describe it very well. every word i use in
describing something is describing it. but how much of that description
is understood by others i cannot determine. it does not concern me that
much. is it important that what i say be understood by anyone? who am i
that anyone should listen to what i have to say let alone understand it?
am i responsible for their understanding? i do not understand them except
in the most simple terms. if someone says, cat, i know what a cat is. i
can even imagine a tiger from it. but i don't always know what they mean
by saying, cat. and forget about something like love. and forget about
truth, justice, freedom and so on. you asked at first what is the form
of our disease. this is it. is language a virus as old bill said it was?
it binds us together but it divides us as well at the same time. it creates
bridges. but those bridges are more often used to invade and conquer not
to trade and exchange. oh well. that's that. it's the way it is. we all
have this disease. you have it. i have it. yet i choose not to suffer from
it. if you and others choose otherwise then that is your choice.
goof:
do we choose that? are we given a choice?
prism:
one cannot often have much choice in what occurs and what is. but one can
choose how one responds to what occurs and what is. and as i said before,
there is a balance. do i suffer? i suffer as much as anyone, i would imagine.
i am not immune to suffering. we all suffer. some more and some less. i
try to see this and keep it in mind. i try not to allow myself to become
too overwhelmed by it. i feel that i suffer and that i do not suffer.
goof:
what does that feel like?
prism:
both ways. either/or. i must say that i don't really quite know. it's almost
like not feeling but that's not it. it's not numbness of feeling. it's
more a neutralization of feeling. one feels everything and all that one
feels balances out. one cancels the other while at the same time both are
felt. but that's not exactly it either. nothing is not experienced. nothing
is taken away. each component is experienced fully in and of itself but
not alone and separated from the rest of what one feels. maybe that's the
difference. i do not experience these various states of feeling separately
but blended together as a whole. but not blended as a undifferentiated
mush. it's more like blended across a spectrum of contrast. one may like
one over another but still one wants to experience them all.
and he
is tired of writing this crap. it's just some sort of compulsive habit.
but he still writes it. he cannot not write it.
everything
is becoming darker. everyone's closing off the light. all talking about
the world coming to an end. they seem to want it to come to an end. they've
given up.
and he
can't blame them too much. who asked for this? who asked to be created
and born? to be brought here into this mess of people driven by their biology
and one is the same as them. one's body and mind have their own motivation.
they cannot be trusted. and these needs of the body and mind become one's
own needs through the use of pain and pleasure they can cause.
but so
many have been down this path and written about it. it doesn't matter.
and in a dream we speak to ourselves. we stand in character upon the stage of the burning theater. outside is the rubble of what once had been. we can only imagine how it might have appeared.
goof:
what is the problem? what is broken? what are we constantly fighting over?
prism:
we divide ourselves into camps of us and them.
goof:
not all of us.
prism:
by saying that you have just done it.
goof:
i didn't create the division. i just stated how it is.
prism:
no one creates it. everyone is stating how it is. that is how it is created.
goof:
so you create it too?
prism:
how did i do that?
goof:
you said we divide ourselves into us and them.
prism:
and who is we?
goof:
all of us.
prism:
yes, all of us. you were the one who divided us into those who do and those
who don't.
goof:
but that's true.
prism:
is it?
goof:
there are those of us who don't divide people into categories and camps.
prism:
but that in itself divides people into two categories and camps. i did
not do that. you did. i said we divide, not we are divided.
goof:
what's the difference?
prism:
we are all of us. we all divide. that makes us one. that makes us all of
us. we. your description divides between the primary division - us and
them.
goof:
what about you? do you divide?
prism:
yes.
goof:
but you said you didn't.
prism:
did i?
goof:
well, maybe you actually didn't. but you gave that impression. you seem
to saying that there is no us and them except for people saying that there
are.
prism:
that is basically what i am saying. in actuality there is no us and them.
there is only us. us being people - the human race. but it is a shared
characteristic among us that we divide ourselves apart from one another.
we each do it differently along different lines, but we all do it. i am
one of us, so therefore i must do it too.
goof:
how?
prism:
i represent the most extreme. to me it is not us and them but me and them.
goof:
so to you i am one of them?
prism:
yes.
goof:
thanks a lot, pal.
prism:
but i also recognize that you and i are us in the greater sense of all
of us being us.
goof:
doesn't that contradict the other?
prism:
how so?
goof:
i don't know. it just seems like it would. but i think i get it. we all
divide. you divide. you pointed out that i divide, though i thought i wasn't,
but i was. so everything is true.
prism:
bingo...
and that
goes nowhere while seeming to be going somewhere.
what
is left when it ends and is gone? when one does what one does in the context
and within the parameters of a situation and reaches the limit and the
end of the extent to which one's actions may play a part and have an effect
one way or another in that situation. when the others working separately
or together effectively eliminate or at least neutralize the effect of
one's actions. when one is isolated by the group because one is an individual
factor independently operating from outside the group's control. this is
something that groups universally cannot tolerate. it threatens the group
no matter what else the group is doing or trying to accomplish or what
its supposed philosophy is. defending itself will become its first priority
over all other activity, even at the expense of all other activity.